A planning tool that projects an Industry Super option against a self-managed fund (SMSF)
over a 20-year horizon and estimates the fee and tax drag on each — admin and
investment fees, annual earnings tax, and the unrealised CGT a pooled fund crystallises when it moves you to pension
phase. Tune the returns, contributions, horizon and every fee to fit your own plan.
Industry Super · net after transition
—
—
SMSF · net after transition
—
—
Difference
—
—
Scenario (applies to both)
Super contributionspaid into super each year
Industry Super
Admin: $1.10/wk + 0.10% on the first $500,000 (capped at $500/yr).
Admin feescurrent annual $0
Investment & transaction% of balance, charged each year
SMSF
Set your running costs below. No exit CGT at transition to pension phase.
Where the money goes, year by year
Each bar = your end-of-year balance (the money you keep) plus the cumulative fees & taxes
paid to that point — so the full bar shows how the pie has been divided. The exit-CGT slice appears only in the
final year (Year 20), the moment of transition to pension phase.
Every year, for the selected vehicle: the contribution in, each fee/tax line, the total cost for
that year, and the resulting principal (end-of-year balance). The opening row is your starting capital; the Total
row sums each column over the 20 years. Exit CGT lands once, in Year
20.
Year
Contribution
Admin
Investment
Transaction
Earnings tax
Exit CGT
Total cost
Balance (principal)
Show calculations
Live working for the Industry Super ledger with your current inputs. Pick any
year for the per-year recurrence; the right block shows the one-off exit-CGT calculation at transition.
Per-year recurrence — Year
Exit CGT at transition (Year 20)
Formula reference — worked with your numbers
The trade-off in one line: with both fees set low, the running-cost gap is small — the decider is the
exit hit. A pooled fund hands back ~10% of unrealised gains on the way into pension; an SMSF held into pension
phase doesn't. So the SMSF tends to win by more the larger the embedded gain has grown.
The CGT premise is yours, and worth verifying. Not every APRA fund crystallises a member's full
unrealised CGT on an internal accumulation→pension switch — some pool deferred tax across members. Confirm your
fund's actual treatment before relying on the gap; it's the entire ballgame (toggle it off to compare on fees alone).
Same gross return assumed for both to isolate cost/tax drag. A 100%-equity index ETF is fully growth,
so in reality it would carry slightly higher expected return and volatility than a diversified option.
Simplifications: contributions treated as the net amount invested (15% contributions tax applies equally
to both, so it's omitted); earnings tax = 15% on income with franking credits ignored (also roughly equal). All
four fee lines are sliders — set them to what your fund / ETF / broker actually quotes.
General information only — not financial or tax advice, and I'm not a licensed adviser. Super and
CGT outcomes are highly individual; confirm fund-specific tax treatment and your own circumstances with your fund
and a licensed professional before acting.